Payne v. New York City Police Departmen
| Elliot O. Payne and David A. Payne |
| City of New York |
| New York City Police Department, Doe 4, a NYC Police Officer, Doe 2, a NYC Police Officer, 67th Precinct, Doe 6, a NYC Police Officer, Doe 1, a NYC Police Officer, Doe 5, a NYC Police Officer, Doe 3, a NYC Police Officer, Kings County Criminal Court, John Does 1-20 and Lieutenant Edwards |
| Patricia Atkins-Payne |
| 19-2359 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Edwards, FILED. Service date 08/19/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2636069] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/19/2019 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Zachary W. Carter, for Appellee 67th Precinct, Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 6, John Does 1-20, and New York City Police Department , TERMINATED.[2635470] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/19/2019 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 16 LETTER, dated 08/19/2019, on behalf of Appellee 67th Precinct, Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6, John Does 1-20 and New York City Police Department, requesting that the Office of Corporation Counsel no longer be identified as counsel for the parties, RECEIVED. Service date 08/19/2019 by email.[2635459] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/19/2019 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE, to Appellee 67th Precinct, Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 6, John Does 1-20, Kings County Criminal Court and New York City Police Department, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2635306] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/19/2019 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [ # 9 ], on behalf of Appellee Edwards, FILED.[2635294] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/19/2019 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Ellen Sara Ravitch, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Zachary W. Carter, SUBSTITUTED.[2635278] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/19/2019 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Edwards, FILED. Service date 08/16/2019 by US mail. [2635047] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/16/2019 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, [5], on behalf of City of New York and Appellee Lieutenant Edwards, FILED.[2634442] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/16/2019 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Patricia Atkins-Payne, FILED. Service date 08/13/2019 by US mail.[2635112] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/16/2019 06:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Patricia Atkins-Payne, FILED. Service date 08/13/2019 by US mail.[2635111] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/16/2019 06:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2632487] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/14/2019 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Patricia Atkins-Payne, district court receipt # 4653142599, FILED.[2632483] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/14/2019 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of -- City of New York and Edwards, FILED. Service date 08/13/2019 by US mail. [2631208] [19-2359] [Entered: 08/13/2019 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2621702] [19-2359] [Entered: 07/31/2019 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2621698] [19-2359] [Entered: 07/31/2019 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER entered in the district court on 04/24/2019, RECEIVED.[2621697] [19-2359] [Entered: 07/31/2019 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Patricia Atkins-Payne, FILED. [2621696] [19-2359] [Entered: 07/31/2019 05:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
