Taylor v. New York City Department of Co
| Counselor Moore, Counselor Gentry, Coordinator Kelly, Counselor Hakim, Eric M. Taylor Center Clothes Box Correction Offic Scipion, Eric M. Taylor Center Corredtion Officer Dunson, Otis Bantum Correctional Center Captain Elam, Security Correction Officer Thompson, Coordinator Mulvanny, Counselor Berry, Social Services Counselers, Berry and hakim, New York City Department of Correction, Social Services Counselers, Defendant Social Service Counselors Mr. Moore & Dentry, Santiago, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Otis Bantum Correctional Center Warden Wettington, Otis Bantum Correctional Center Grievance Coordina Kennedy, Administrative Law judge Eva Urrutia, Otis Bantum Correctional Center Correction Officer Smith, New York State Department of Corrections Paroe Chairman, Tina Stanford and Senior Probation Officer B. Crome, EMT/DEP Warden Nance, Otis Bantum Correctional Center Correction Officer Cruz and Otis Bantum Correctional Center Clothes Box Correc Ellis |
| Roy Taylor |
| 19-256 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for Appellee New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and New York State Department of Corrections Paroe Chairman, TERMINATED.[2519439] [19-256] [Entered: 03/18/2019 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 33 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and New York State Department of Corrections Paroe Chairman, remove New York State Office of the Attorney General as counsel, RECEIVED. Service date 03/15/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2519352] [19-256]--[Edited 03/18/2019 by KR] [Entered: 03/15/2019 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 29 SUPPLEMENTARY PAPERS TO MOTION [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Roy Taylor, FILED. Service date 02/22/2019 by US mail.[2513527][29] [19-256] [Entered: 03/08/2019 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 23 CERTIFIED PRISONER AUTHORIZATION FORM, dated 02/21/2019, to Rikers Island, Anna M. Kross Center, in care or Warden, ISSUED.[2501558] [19-256] [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 22 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 01/09/2019 by US mail.[2501547] [19-256] [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 21 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Roy Taylor, informing Court of proposed due date 01/20/2019, RECEIVED. Service date 01/09/2019 by US mail.[2501546] [19-256] [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 20 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Roy Taylor, FILED. Service date 01/09/2019 by US mail.[2501544] [19-256] [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Roy Taylor, FILED. Service date 01/09/2019 by US mail.[2501543] [19-256] [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Roy Taylor, FILED. Service date 01/06/2019 by US mail.[2501527] [19-256] [Entered: 02/21/2019 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE, to Appellee Cruz, Gentry, Kelly, Kennedy, Moore, Mulvanny, Nance, New York City Department of Correction, New York State Department of Corrections Paroe Chairman, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Santiago, Scipion, Smith, Social Services Counselers, Social Services Counselers, Thompson, Eva Urrutia and Wettington , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2498931] [19-256] [Entered: 02/19/2019 11:16 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 02/14/2019, dismissing appeal by 03/07/2019, unless Appellant Roy Taylor submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED.[2496783] [19-256] [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 02/14/2019, dismissing appeal by 03/07/2019, unless Appellant Roy Taylor submits Form D-P, FILED.[2496764] [19-256] [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:30 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 02/14/2019, dismissing appeal by 03/07/2019, unless Appellant Roy Taylor submits fee or moves for informa pauperis, FILED.[2496752] [19-256] [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:24 AM]
|
| Filing 11 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2496522] [19-256]--[Edited 02/14/2019 by KR] [Entered: 02/14/2019 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DUPLICATE APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Roy Taylor, FILED. [2496520] [19-256] [Entered: 02/14/2019 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Berry, Dunson, Elam, Ellis and Hakim, FILED. Service date 02/11/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2494349] [19-256] [Entered: 02/11/2019 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Nwamaka Ejebe, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Zachary W. Carter, SUBSTITUTED.[2493392] [19-256] [Entered: 02/11/2019 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Berry, Dunson, Elam, Ellis and Hakim, FILED. Service date 02/08/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2493280] [19-256] [Entered: 02/08/2019 05:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2483735] [19-256] [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2483731] [19-256] [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2483729] [19-256] [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER,, dated 01/22/2019, RECEIVED.[2483727] [19-256] [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/19/2018, RECEIVED.[2483726] [19-256] [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Roy Taylor, FILED. [2483720] [19-256] [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
