Woodward v. Ali
Miller, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Coxsackie Correctional Facility, CO Baldwin, Law, C.O., Paulin, Sgt. and Daniel F. Martuscello, Superintendent; Coxsackie Correctional Facility |
Dr. Ali, Muslim Chaplain; Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Stevenson, C.O. |
Shawn Woodward |
19-2612 |
August 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, for assignment of pro bono counsel, to consolidate appeals, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, Form D-P [ # 21 ],[ # 21 ],[ # 21 ], [ # 22 ], [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED.[2673985] [19-2612] [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:31 PM] |
Filing 23 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED. Service date 09/30/2019 by US mail.[2673981] [19-2612] [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:29 PM] |
Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Shawn Woodward, FILED. Service date 09/30/2019 by US mail.[2673976] [19-2612] [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:28 PM] |
Filing 21 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, for assignment of pro bono counsel, to consolidate appeals, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED. Service date 09/30/2019 by US mail.[2673975] [19-2612] [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:27 PM] |
Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Ali and Stevenson, FILED. Service date 09/26/2019 by US mail.[2665961] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/26/2019 03:50 PM] |
Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Kate H. Nepveu, [ # 16 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2656546] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/16/2019 04:11 PM] |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Ali and Stevenson, FILED. Service date 09/16/2019 by US mail. [2656411] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/16/2019 03:04 PM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE, to Appellee Ali and Stevenson, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2653941] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:44 PM] |
Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [10], on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED.[2653932] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:39 PM] |
Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, [9], on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED.[2653922] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:34 PM] |
Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for in forma pauperis, [8], on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED.[2653913] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:29 PM] |
Filing 11 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. No Service.[2653910] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:27 PM] |
Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED. No Service.[2653906] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:26 PM] |
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Shawn Woodward, FILED. No Service .[2653904] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:25 PM] |
Filing 8 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED. No Service.[2653899] [19-2612] [Entered: 09/12/2019 12:24 PM] |
Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2637924] [19-2612] [Entered: 08/21/2019 11:00 AM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2637920] [19-2612] [Entered: 08/21/2019 10:57 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2637916] [19-2612] [Entered: 08/21/2019 10:56 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/24/2019, RECEIVED.[2637910] [19-2612] [Entered: 08/21/2019 10:54 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Woodward, FILED. [2637900] [19-2612] [Entered: 08/21/2019 10:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.