Davidson v. Desai
| Robert Guzman, Anne Rabideau, R.N., Deborah Bartlett-Bigg, R.N., Katherine Frawley, R.N., Glenn Goord, Wexford Health Services, (or whatever other corporation name they are known by) and their officers and executives, Lester Wright, M.D., Marijon Hopkins, R.N., Nancy O'Connell, R.N., Thomas Eagen, Sheryl Graubard and Marshall Trabout, M.D. |
| Dana M. Smith, Heman K. Fowler, N.P., Cheng Yin, M.D., Welsey Canfield, M.D. present facility health services director at Elmira C.F., Uday K. Desai, M.D., Floyd Bennett and Calvin West |
| Ronald Davidson |
| 19-280 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 SEALED Record on Appeal of originating court or agency, FILED. Volume(s): 1 of 1, (Document 112 only).[2524451] [19-280] [Entered: 03/22/2019 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 22 ADDRESS CHANGE REQUEST, dated 03/01/2019 COMPLETED.[2517901] [19-280] [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT:ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [ # 14 ], [ # 16 ], on behalf of Appellant Ronald Davidson, FILED.[2517827] [19-280] [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 19 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Davidson, FILED. Service date 03/01/2019 by US mail, fax.[2517845] [19-280] [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Davidson, FILED. Service date 03/01/2019 by US mail.[2517839] [19-280] [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Ronald Davidson, FILED. Service date 03/01/2019 by US mail.[2517825] [19-280] [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 15 ADDRESS CHANGE REQUEST, dated 02/26/2019, COMPLETED.[2505538] [19-280] [Entered: 02/26/2019 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [13], on behalf of Appellant Ronald Davidson, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2505535] [19-280] [Entered: 02/26/2019 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Davidson, FILED. Service date 02/15/2019 by US mail.[2505519] [19-280] [Entered: 02/26/2019 01:09 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 02/20/2019, dismissing appeal by 03/13/2019,unless Appellant Ronald Davidson,submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2500232] [19-280] [Entered: 02/20/2019 10:04 AM]
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE, to Appellee Floyd Bennett, Welsey Canfield, Uday K. Desai, Heman K. Fowler, Dana M. Smith, Calvin West and Cheng Yin , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2500223] [19-280] [Entered: 02/20/2019 09:59 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER, dated 02/11/2019, dismissing appeal by 03/04/2019,unless Appellant Ronald Davidson,submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2493744] [19-280] [Entered: 02/11/2019 11:54 AM]
|
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2487448] [19-280] [Entered: 02/01/2019 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2487441] [19-280] [Entered: 02/01/2019 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/09/2019, RECEIVED.[2487407] [19-280] [Entered: 02/01/2019 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 01/08/2019, RECEIVED.[2487399] [19-280] [Entered: 02/01/2019 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Davidson, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [2487384] [19-280] [Entered: 02/01/2019 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
