Alsop v. Warden
Christopher Alsop |
Warden |
19-2804 |
September 3, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, FILED. Service date 10/01/2019 by US mail.[2675436] [19-2804] [Entered: 10/08/2019 03:10 PM] |
Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, FILED. Service date 10/01/2019 by US mail.[2675432] [19-2804] [Entered: 10/08/2019 03:08 PM] |
Filing 15 ORDER, dated 09/24/2019, dismissing appeal by 10/15/2019, unless Appellant Christopher Alsop, submits Form D-P, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2663082] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/24/2019 02:03 PM] |
Filing 14 ORDER, dated 09/24/2019, dismissing appeal by 10/15/2019, unless Appellant Christopher Alsop, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2663074] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:59 PM] |
Filing 11 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [ # 10 ],[ # 10 ],[ # 10 ], on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, FILED.[2663058] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:56 PM] |
Filing 10 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, for certificate of appealability, to remand appeal, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, FILED. Service date 09/17/2019 by US mail.[2663057] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:55 PM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Karen Folster Lesperance for Appellee Warden, in case 19-2804 , [ # 8 ], ADDED.[2655164] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/13/2019 01:53 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Warden, FILED. Service date 09/12/2019 by US mail. [2653818] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/12/2019 11:54 AM] |
Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, for certificate of appealability, [6],[6], on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2653802] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/12/2019 11:49 AM] |
Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, FILED. No Service.[2653799] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/12/2019 11:48 AM] |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Warden, FILED. Service date 09/09/2019 by US mail.[2650398] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/09/2019 01:53 PM] |
Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2647657] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/05/2019 10:57 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/22/2019, RECEIVED.[2647652] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/05/2019 10:57 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Alsop, FILED. [2647648] [19-2804] [Entered: 09/05/2019 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Alsop v. Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Christopher Alsop | |
Represented By: | Christopher Alsop |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Warden | |
Represented By: | Steven David Clymer |
Represented By: | Karen Folster Lesperance Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.