Johnson v. United States of America
James Johnson |
United States of America |
19-3134 |
October 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2669166] [19-3134] [Entered: 10/01/2019 03:02 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION, to file successive petition, on behalf of Petitioner James Johnson, FILED. Service date 09/26/2019 by US mail.[2669008] [19-3134] [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:40 PM] |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, on behalf of Petitioner James Johnson, FILED.[2669004] [19-3134] [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Johnson v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Sarah Kathleen Eddy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: James Johnson | |
Represented By: | James Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.