Myles v. Jacobs
| The County of Nassau, Jay Jacobs, John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10, Dave Gugerty, in his official capacity as Democratic Commissioner of the Nassau County Board of Elections and Nassau County Board of Elections |
| Runnie Myles |
| 19-3373 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE, to Appellee Dave Gugerty, Jay Jacobs, John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10, Nassau County Board of Elections and The County of Nassau , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2717584] [19-3373] [Entered: 11/27/2019 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION ORDER, deferring motion for admission pro hac vice [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Runnie Myles, FILED. [2697545][8] [19-3373] [Entered: 11/04/2019 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION, for admission pro hac vice, on behalf of Appellant Runnie Myles, FILED. Service date 10/30/2019 by email.[2693719] [19-3373] [Entered: 10/31/2019 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Jonathan C Clarke for Appellant Runnie Myles, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[2682835] [19-3373] [Entered: 10/18/2019 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2682831] [19-3373] [Entered: 10/18/2019 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/18/2019, RECEIVED.[2682828] [19-3373] [Entered: 10/18/2019 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Runnie Myles, FILED. [2682824] [19-3373] [Entered: 10/18/2019 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
