Mairena Blandon v. Barr
| David Francisco Mairena Blandon, AKA David Mairena |
| William P. Barr, United States Attorney General |
| 19-3607 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Jenny C. Lee, [ # 15 ], in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2696128] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL, [ # 14 ], [ # 15 ], on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED.[2696119] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr in 19-3607, 18-2438, FILED. Service date 11/01/2019 by US mail. [2696097] [19-3607, 18-2438] [Entered: 11/01/2019 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance for Substitution of Counsel, [2], on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[2695898] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2695842] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 10 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Petitioner, SENT.[2695831] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 11/01/2019 by US mail. [2695736] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 EMERGENCY MOTION, for stay of removal, MOTION, to consolidate appeals, MOTION, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Petitioner David Francisco Mairena Blandon, FILED. Service date 10/28/2019 by US mail.[2695818] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Petitioner David Francisco Mairena Blandon, FILED. Service date 10/28/2019 by US mail.[2695788] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTE: See lead case, 18-2438, containing complete set of docket entries.[2695766] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner David Francisco Mairena Blandon, FILED. Service date 10/28/2019 by US mail.[2695757] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 10/15/2019, RECEIVED.[2695744] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner David Francisco Mairena Blandon, FILED. [2695540] [19-3607] [Entered: 11/01/2019 12:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mairena Blandon v. Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Jenny C. Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Francisco Mairena Blandon, AKA David Mairena | |
| Represented By: | David Francisco Mairena Blandon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
