Hughes v. United States of America
| Leslie Hughes |
| United States of America |
| 19-38 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to extend time to file documents, [15], on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2501491] [19-38] [Entered: 02/21/2019 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION, to extend time to file documents, on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, FILED. Service date 02/20/2019 by CM/ECF.[2501489] [19-38] [Entered: 02/21/2019 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 14 LETTER, dated 02/14/2019, on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, informing the Court the activities in the facility has prevented him from filling out documents and requests an extension of time to file, RECEIVED. Service date 02/20/2019 by CM/ECF.[2501487] [19-38] [Entered: 02/21/2019 09:47 AM] |
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 01/29/2019, dismissing appeal by 02/19/2019, unless Petitioner Leslie Hughes, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[2484005] [19-38] [Entered: 01/29/2019 09:29 AM]
|
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to extend time to file brief/memorandum, extension of 30 days to file petition, [9], on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[2481418] [19-38] [Entered: 01/24/2019 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, [8], on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2481405] [19-38] [Entered: 01/24/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION, to extend time to file brief/memorandum, extension of 30 days to file petition, on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, FILED. Service date 01/16/2019 by US mail.[2481402] [19-38] [Entered: 01/24/2019 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Leslie Hughes, FILED. Service date 01/16/2019 by US mail.[2481398] [19-38] [Entered: 01/24/2019 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent United States of America, FILED. Service date 01/08/2019 by US mail.[2469929] [19-38] [Entered: 01/08/2019 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2468532] [19-38] [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2468490] [19-38] [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 11/26/2018, RECEIVED.[2468488] [19-38] [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Hughes, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [2468476] [19-38] [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hughes v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Steven David Clymer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Leslie Hughes | |
| Represented By: | Leslie Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
