Wang v. International Business Machine
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| Jian Wang, AKA James Wang |
| 19-3851 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Jian Wang Brief due date as 03/09/2020. Joint Appendix due date as 03/09/2020, copy to pro se, FILED.[2726199] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/11/2019 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 19 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Jian Wang, informing Court of proposed due date 03/09/2020, RECEIVED. Service date 12/09/2019 by US mail, email.[2726140] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/11/2019 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Jasmine Beard, copy to pro se appellant, ASSIGNED.[2721368] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/04/2019 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Steven J. Seidenfeld for International Business Machines Corporation, in case 19-3851, [ # 13 ], ADDED.[2718894] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/02/2019 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Dana G. Weisbrod, [ # 12 ], in place of attorney Steven J. Seidenfeld, SUBSTITUTED.[2718892] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/02/2019 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee International Business Machines Corporation, FILED. Service date 12/02/2019 by CM/ECF, email. [2718869] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/02/2019 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee International Business Machines Corporation, FILED. Service date 12/02/2019 by CM/ECF, email. [2718861] [19-3851] [Entered: 12/02/2019 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Jian Wang, FILED. Service date 11/24/2019 by email, US mail.[2715255] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/25/2019 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Jian Wang, FILED. Service date 11/24/2019 by US mail.[2715254] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/25/2019 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Jian Wang, district court receipt # 465401248899, FILED.[2713439] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/22/2019 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[2710909] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2710908] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 10/28/2019, RECEIVED.[2710905] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jian Wang, FILED. [2710895] [19-3851] [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wang v. International Business Machine | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: International Business Machines Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Steven J. Seidenfeld Esq. |
| Represented By: | Dana G. Weisbrod |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Jian Wang, AKA James Wang | |
| Represented By: | Jian Wang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
