Johnson v. Secure Pawn Shop
Robert W. Johnson |
Dell Inc., Secure Pawn Shop and Clerk John Doe |
19-4270 |
December 20, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Robert W. Johnson, informing Court of proposed due date 01/26/2020, RECEIVED. Service date 12/25/2019 by US mail.[2743983] [19-4270] [Entered: 01/06/2020 10:08 AM] |
Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Robert W. Johnson, FILED. Service date 12/25/2019 by US mail.[2743975] [19-4270] [Entered: 01/06/2020 10:08 AM] |
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Robert W. Johnson, FILED. Service date 12/25/2019 by US mail.[2743971] [19-4270] [Entered: 01/06/2020 10:07 AM] |
Filing 8 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Robert W. Johnson, FILED. Service date 12/25/2019 by US mail.[2743968] [19-4270] [Entered: 01/06/2020 10:05 AM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2736431] [19-4270] [Entered: 12/20/2019 08:22 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2736430] [19-4270] [Entered: 12/20/2019 08:18 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/03/2019, RECEIVED.[2736428] [19-4270] [Entered: 12/20/2019 08:12 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 12/03/2019, RECEIVED.[2736427] [19-4270] [Entered: 12/20/2019 08:11 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robert W. Johnson, FILED. [2736426] [19-4270] [Entered: 12/20/2019 08:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.