United States of America v. Capelli
Scott Bodnar, AKA Pep, Donald Burns and Terrell Givens |
United States of America |
Robert Capelli |
19-4362 |
December 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 8 PRO SE DOCUMENTS, to attorney William F. Dow, SENT.[2747796] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/09/2020 11:14 AM] |
Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for appointment of CJA counsel, [6], on behalf of Appellant Robert Capelli, FILED.[2747778] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/09/2020 11:10 AM] |
Filing 6 MOTION, for appointment of CJA counsel, on behalf of Appellant Robert Capelli, FILED. No Service. [2747773] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/09/2020 11:09 AM] |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Rahul Kale for United States of America, in case 19-4362, [ # 4 ], ADDED.[2745167] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/07/2020 09:08 AM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 01/06/2020 by CM/ECF. [2744746] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/06/2020 04:01 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2742791] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/03/2020 11:50 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/19/2019, RECEIVED.[2742788] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/03/2020 11:50 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robert Capelli, FILED. [2742779] [19-4362] [Entered: 01/03/2020 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.