Dehaney v. Chagnon
| Amy Chagnon, State School Teacher and Maria Pirro Simmons, State School Principal |
| Errol Dehaney |
| 19-474 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 LETTER, dated 04/12/2019, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, Alerting the court that the papers to cured the defective document have already been sent, RECEIVED. Service date 04/01/2019 by US mail.[2543382] [19-474] [Entered: 04/18/2019 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL [ # 18 ],[ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, FILED.[2535523] [19-474] [Entered: 04/09/2019 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to withdraw appeal, [15], on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, copy to pro se, FILED.[2535132] [19-474] [Entered: 04/08/2019 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, FILED. Service date 04/01/2019 by US mail.[2535519] [19-474] [Entered: 04/09/2019 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 17 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, FILED. Service date 03/29/2019 by US mail.[2535138] [19-474] [Entered: 04/08/2019 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, FILED. No Service.[2535127] [19-474] [Entered: 04/08/2019 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 14 CAPTION, party rearrangement, AMENDED.[2531597] [19-474] [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to withdraw appeal, [12], on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, copy to pro se, FILED.[2531592] [19-474] [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, FILED. No Service.[2531589] [19-474] [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Errol Dehaney, FILED. Service date 03/22/2019 by US mail.[2531585] [19-474] [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER, dated 03/20/2019, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, Advising the Court of his new address , RECEIVED. Service date 03/29/2019 by US mail.[2529057] [19-474] [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:59 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 03/15/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/05/2019, unless Appellant Errol Dehaney submits, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se, FILED.[2518940] [19-474] [Entered: 03/15/2019 01:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER, dated 03/15/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/05/2019, unless Appellant Errol Dehaney submits, Form D-P, copy to pro se, FILED.[2518933] [19-474] [Entered: 03/15/2019 01:12 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Amy Chagnon and Maria Pirro Simmons, FILED. Service date 03/14/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2518158] [19-474] [Entered: 03/14/2019 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE, to Appellee Amy Chagnon and Maria Pirro Simmons , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2515590] [19-474] [Entered: 03/12/2019 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2504799] [19-474] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2504793] [19-474] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2504781] [19-474] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 01/25/2019, RECEIVED.[2504777] [19-474] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Errol Dehaney, FILED. [2504772] [19-474] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
