Roberts v. Griffin
Thomas Griffin |
Stephen T. Roberts |
19-478 |
February 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE, Case Status, SENT.[2527281] [19-478] [Entered: 03/27/2019 04:50 PM] |
Filing 19 LETTER, dated 03/25/2019, on behalf of Appellant Stephen T. Roberts, requesting a case status update, RECEIVED. No service date.[2527279] [19-478] [Entered: 03/27/2019 04:49 PM] |
Filing 15 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, for certificate of appealability, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Stephen T. Roberts, FILED. Service date 03/20/2019 by US mail.[2524459] [19-478] [Entered: 03/22/2019 04:49 PM] |
Filing 14 ORDER, dated 03/19/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/09/2019, unless Appellant Stephen T. Roberts, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2521488] [19-478] [Entered: 03/19/2019 04:24 PM] |
Filing 13 NOTICE, Case Status, SENT.[2517508] [19-478] [Entered: 03/13/2019 04:26 PM] |
Filing 12 LETTER, dated 03/11/2019, on behalf of Appellant Stephen T. Roberts, requesting the appropriate forms to file a motion for appointment of counsel and the submission of the appropriate forms, RECEIVED. No service date.[2517507] [19-478] [Entered: 03/13/2019 04:25 PM] |
Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Stephen T. Roberts, FILED. Service date 03/11/2019 by US mail.[2517498] [19-478] [Entered: 03/13/2019 04:23 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Stephen T. Roberts, FILED. Service date 03/11/2019 by US mail.[2517482] [19-478] [Entered: 03/13/2019 04:17 PM] |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Dennis A. Rambaud, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2506279] [19-478] [Entered: 02/27/2019 10:58 AM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Thomas Griffin, FILED. Service date 02/27/2019 by US mail. [2506267] [19-478] [Entered: 02/27/2019 10:55 AM] |
Filing 9 PAPERS, duplicate notice of appeal form, RECEIVED.[2511528] [19-478] [Entered: 03/06/2019 12:08 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Petitioner, SENT.[2505361] [19-478] [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:25 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2505359] [19-478] [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:23 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/06/2019, RECEIVED.[2505349] [19-478] [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:19 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 01/28/2019, RECEIVED.[2505344] [19-478] [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:18 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Stephen T. Roberts, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [2505332] [19-478] [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Roberts v. Griffin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Thomas Griffin | |
Represented By: | Dennis Rambaud Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Stephen T. Roberts | |
Represented By: | Stephen T. Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.