Abdul-Malik v. City Government Office of Cour
City Government Office of Court Administration, New York State Unified Court System, 11th Judicial District, Kevin Morrissey, Maria L. Bradley, Daniel Friedman, Sherrill Spatz, Francis Kenna, Pat Kelly, Susan Woods, R. Teichman, Tamara Kersh, Kevin Rothermel, Kelly Ann Porter and Audrey I. Pheffer |
Salim Abdul-Malik |
19-546 |
March 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [ # 22 ], on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED.[2545860] [19-546] [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:33 AM] |
Filing 23 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED. Service date 04/22/2019 by US mail.[2545858] [19-546] [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:32 AM] |
Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED. Service date 04/22/2019 by US mail.[2545853] [19-546] [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:32 AM] |
Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [16], on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED.[2532605] [19-546] [Entered: 04/04/2019 10:49 AM] |
Filing 19 PAPERS, Certificate of Service, on behalf of Party Salim Abdul-Malik, RECEIVED.[2532623] [19-546] [Entered: 04/04/2019 10:58 AM] |
Filing 17 PAPERS, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Form C and D, on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, RECEIVED. [2532596] [19-546] [Entered: 04/04/2019 10:44 AM] |
Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED. Service date 03/27/2019 by US mail.[2532594] [19-546] [Entered: 04/04/2019 10:42 AM] |
Filing 12 PAPERS, Form C and D, on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, RECEIVED.[2529333] [19-546] [Entered: 04/01/2019 09:24 AM] |
Filing 11 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED. Service date 03/19/2019 by US mail.[2529330] [19-546] [Entered: 04/01/2019 09:23 AM] |
Filing 10 NOTICE, to Appellee New York State Unified Court System, Audrey I. Pheffer and Sherrill Spatz, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2522861] [19-546] [Entered: 03/21/2019 11:02 AM] |
Filing 9 ORDER, dated 03/19/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/09/2019, unless Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik submits Form D-P, FILED.[2520653] [19-546] [Entered: 03/19/2019 09:58 AM] |
Filing 8 ORDER, dated 03/19/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/09/2019, unless Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, FILED.[2520648] [19-546] [Entered: 03/19/2019 09:54 AM] |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Zachary W. Carter, for Tamara Kersh and City Government Office of Court Administration, TERMINATED.[2520643] [19-546] [Entered: 03/19/2019 09:52 AM] |
Filing 6 LETTER, dated 03/12/2019, on behalf of Appellee City Government Office of Court Administration and Tamara Kersh, please remove the name of Zachary W. Carter as counsel for Tamara Kersh and City Government Office of Court Administration, RECEIVED. Service date 03/12/2019 by US mail.[2516367] [19-546] [Entered: 03/12/2019 04:34 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2511531] [19-546] [Entered: 03/06/2019 12:09 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2511515] [19-546] [Entered: 03/06/2019 12:05 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S JUDGMENT, dated 01/31/2019, RECEIVED.[2511514] [19-546] [Entered: 03/06/2019 12:05 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 01/29/2019, RECEIVED.[2511511] [19-546] [Entered: 03/06/2019 12:04 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Salim Abdul-Malik, FILED. [2511496] [19-546] [Entered: 03/06/2019 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.