Smith v. State of New York
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections Secretary
Respondent: State of New York
Respondent / Appellee: Timothy McKoy, Administrator of Franklin Correctional Center, Attorney General of the State of New York and Barbara D. Underwood
Petitioner / Appellant: Patrick R. Smith
Case Number: 19-68
Filed: January 7, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2019 Filing 33 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME, [ # 29 ], [ # 30 ], on behalf of Appellee Attorney General of the State of New York, Timothy McKoy and Barbara D. Underwood, FILED.[2511472] [19-68] [Entered: 03/06/2019 11:47 AM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 30 MOTION, to extend time, on behalf of Appellee Attorney General of the State of New York, Timothy McKoy and Barbara D. Underwood, FILED. Service date 03/05/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2510864] [19-68] [Entered: 03/05/2019 04:26 PM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 29 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: MOTION, to extend time, [28], on behalf of Appellee Attorney General of the State of New York, Timothy McKoy and Barbara D. Underwood, FILED.[2510697] [19-68] [Entered: 03/05/2019 03:13 PM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 28 MOTION, to extend time, on behalf of Appellee Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General of the State of New York and Timothy McKoy, FILED. Service date 03/05/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2510245] [19-68] [Entered: 03/05/2019 10:58 AM]
February 25, 2019 Filing 23 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: FORM D-P [ # 12 ], [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED.[2504716] [19-68] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:03 PM]
February 22, 2019 Filing 22 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED. Service date 02/14/2019 by US mail.[2504712] [19-68] [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:02 PM]
February 22, 2019 Filing 21 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED. Service date 02/14/2019 by US mail.[2504706] [19-68] [Entered: 02/25/2019 02:59 PM]
February 22, 2019 Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Apellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED. Service date 02/14/2019 by US mail.[2504705] [19-68] [Entered: 02/25/2019 02:58 PM]
February 8, 2019 Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Lisa M. Denig, [ # 18 ], in place of attorney Barbara Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2492670] [19-68] [Entered: 02/08/2019 11:59 AM]
February 8, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Attorney General of the State of New York, Timothy McKoy and Barbara D. Underwood, FILED. Service date 02/08/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2492599] [19-68] [Entered: 02/08/2019 11:34 AM]
January 31, 2019 Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [11], on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2486704] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 03:19 PM]
January 31, 2019 Filing 16 DISTRICT COURT ORDER Granting IFP, dated 01/08/2019, RECEIVED.[2486702] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 03:18 PM]
January 31, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE, to Appellee Attorney General of the State of New York, Timothy McKoy and Barbara D. Underwood , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2486698] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 03:16 PM]
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER, dated 01/31/2019, dismissing appeal by 02/21/2019,unless Appellant Patrick R. Smith,moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2486690] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 03:12 PM]
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, dated 01/31/2019, dismissing appeal by 02/21/2019,unless Appellant Patrick R. Smith,submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2486681] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 03:06 PM]
January 31, 2019 Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: FORM D-P, [10], on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED.[2486677] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 03:02 PM]
January 29, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED. Service date 01/21/2019 by US mail.[2486664] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 02:53 PM]
January 29, 2019 Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED. Service date 01/21/2019 by US mail.[2486625] [19-68] [Entered: 01/31/2019 02:32 PM]
January 9, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE, re: pending district court IFP motion, to district court, SENT.[2471216] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 02:18 PM]
January 9, 2019 Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [6], on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED.[2471197] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 02:06 PM]
January 9, 2019 Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2471184] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 02:00 PM]
January 7, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, FILED. [2471182] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 01:59 PM]
January 7, 2019 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2471170] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 01:55 PM]
January 7, 2019 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/10/2018, RECEIVED.[2471162] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 01:53 PM]
January 7, 2019 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 12/07/2018, RECEIVED.[2471160] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 01:51 PM]
January 7, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Patrick R. Smith, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [2471154] [19-68] [Entered: 01/09/2019 01:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Smith v. State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Timothy McKoy, Administrator of Franklin Correctional Center
Represented By: Lisa Marie Denig Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Attorney General of the State of New York
Represented By: Lisa Marie Denig Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Barbara D. Underwood
Represented By: Lisa Marie Denig Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Patrick R. Smith
Represented By: Patrick R. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections Secretary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?