Lin v. Barr
Petitioner: Tingyi Lin, AKA Ting Jiang Lin, AKA Cady Jiang
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Case Number: 19-85
Filed: January 8, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2019 Filing 18 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED.[2509405] [19-85] [Entered: 03/04/2019 10:36 AM]
March 4, 2019 Filing 17 Matthew G. Whitaker Respondent, replaced by William P. Barr Respondent, SUBSTITUTED.[2509404] [19-85] [Entered: 03/04/2019 10:35 AM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 16 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [2491933] [19-85] [Entered: 02/07/2019 03:25 PM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 15 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ON APPEAL, FILED.[2491827] [19-85] [Entered: 02/07/2019 02:11 PM]
January 18, 2019 Filing 14 NEW CASE MANAGER, Kyaire Wynn, ASSIGNED.[2478208] [19-85] [Entered: 01/18/2019 11:59 AM]
January 16, 2019 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Tingyi Lin, FILED. Service date 01/16/2019 by CM/ECF.[2476481] [19-85] [Entered: 01/16/2019 01:49 PM]
January 10, 2019 Filing 9 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Tingyi Lin, FILED. Service date 01/10/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2472540] [19-85] [Entered: 01/10/2019 04:17 PM]
January 10, 2019 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, John Frederick Stanton, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2472220] [19-85] [Entered: 01/10/2019 01:22 PM]
January 10, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker, FILED. Service date 01/10/2019 by CM/ECF. [2472072] [19-85] [Entered: 01/10/2019 11:52 AM]
January 9, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2471440] [19-85] [Entered: 01/09/2019 03:51 PM]
January 8, 2019 Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/14/2018, RECEIVED.[2471435] [19-85] [Entered: 01/09/2019 03:50 PM]
January 8, 2019 Filing 2 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Tingyi Lin, USCA receipt # A02-71937-444, FILED.[2471431] [19-85] [Entered: 01/09/2019 03:50 PM]
January 8, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Tingyi Lin, FILED. [2471421] [19-85] [Entered: 01/09/2019 03:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lin v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General
Represented By: John Frederick Stanton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Represented By: John Frederick Stanton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tingyi Lin, AKA Ting Jiang Lin, AKA Cady Jiang
Represented By: Richard Tarzia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?