Richardson v. Quick
Plaintiff / Appellant: Richard Richardson
Defendant / Appellee: C. Hiram, #14 Security Peace Officer-Sergeant and Diancira Quick, #27 Security Peace Officer
Case Number: 19-901
Filed: April 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2019 Filing 16 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2542684] [19-901] [Entered: 04/17/2019 07:00 PM]
April 17, 2019 Filing 15 DUPLICATE NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Richard Richardson, RECEIVED.[2542683] [19-901] [Entered: 04/17/2019 06:59 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 12 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Appellant Richard Richardson, FILED. Service date 04/15/2019 by hand delivery. [2540220] [19-901] [Entered: 04/15/2019 02:43 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 11 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Richard Richardson, informing Court of proposed due date 04/24/2019, RECEIVED. Service date 04/15/2019 by hand delivery.[2540217] [19-901] [Entered: 04/15/2019 02:42 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Richard Richardson, FILED. Service date 04/15/2019 by US mail.[2540215] [19-901] [Entered: 04/15/2019 02:41 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Richard Richardson, FILED. Service date 04/15/2019 by hand delivery.[2540212] [19-901] [Entered: 04/15/2019 02:41 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Richard Richardson, FILED. Service date 04/15/2019 by hand delivery.[2540210] [19-901] [Entered: 04/15/2019 02:40 PM]
April 9, 2019 Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2536279] [19-901] [Entered: 04/09/2019 05:07 PM]
April 9, 2019 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2536276] [19-901] [Entered: 04/09/2019 05:06 PM]
April 9, 2019 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/26/2019, RECEIVED.[2536272] [19-901] [Entered: 04/09/2019 05:05 PM]
April 9, 2019 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/20/2019, RECEIVED.[2536269] [19-901] [Entered: 04/09/2019 05:04 PM]
April 9, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Richard Richardson, FILED. [2536267] [19-901] [Entered: 04/09/2019 05:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richardson v. Quick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Richard Richardson
Represented By: Richard Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C. Hiram, #14 Security Peace Officer-Sergeant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Diancira Quick, #27 Security Peace Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?