Das v. Barr
Petitioner: Sujit Kumar Das, AKA Edgar Yamil Blanco
Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Case Number: 19-970
Filed: April 12, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2019 Filing 32 MOTION, to expedite motion, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 06/06/2019 by US mail. [2581638] [19-970] [Entered: 06/06/2019 01:33 PM]
May 30, 2019 Filing 29 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED, copy to pro se petitioner. [2575036] [19-970]--[Edited 05/30/2019 by KJW] [Entered: 05/30/2019 08:29 AM]
May 29, 2019 Filing 25 OPPOSITION TO MOTION, for stay of removal [ # 13 ], on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 05/29/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2574704] [19-970] [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:43 PM]
May 29, 2019 Filing 24 IMMIGRATION TOLLING CANCELLATION LETTER, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 05/29/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2574687] [19-970] [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:36 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 23 ATTORNEY, Andrew Nathan O'Malley for William P. Barr, in case 19-970, [ # 22 ], ADDED.[2568846] [19-970] [Entered: 05/21/2019 12:08 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 05/21/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2568780] [19-970] [Entered: 05/21/2019 11:49 AM]
May 6, 2019 Filing 20 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [2555959] [19-970] [Entered: 05/06/2019 09:24 AM]
May 3, 2019 Filing 18 CURED DEFECTIVE, Motion for stay of removal, to proceed in forma pauperis, for assignment of pro bono counsel, [ # 13 ], [ # 14 ], [ # 15 ], on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED.[2555565] [19-970] [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:39 PM]
May 3, 2019 Filing 12 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ON APPEAL, FILED.[2555341] [19-970] [Entered: 05/03/2019 01:45 PM]
April 29, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED. Service date 04/26/2019 by US mail.[2555548] [19-970] [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:31 PM]
April 29, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED. Service date 04/23/2019 by US mail.[2555541] [19-970] [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:29 PM]
April 29, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED. Service date 04/23/2019 by US mail.[2555533] [19-970] [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:27 PM]
April 26, 2019 Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Sujit Kumar Das, FILED. Service date 04/23/2019 by US mail.[2555559] [19-970] [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:36 PM]
April 18, 2019 Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Opposition to Motion for stay of removal, to proceed in forma pauperis, for assignment of pro bono counsel, [9], on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED.[2543049] [19-970] [Entered: 04/18/2019 12:05 PM]
April 18, 2019 Filing 9 OPPOSITION TO MOTION, for stay of removal [ # 3 ], to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 3 ], for assignment of pro bono counsel [ # 3 ], on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 04/18/2019 by US mail. [2543043] [19-970] [Entered: 04/18/2019 12:02 PM]
April 16, 2019 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Joseph A. O'Connell, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2541077] [19-970] [Entered: 04/16/2019 11:55 AM]
April 16, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 04/16/2019 by US mail. [2541066] [19-970] [Entered: 04/16/2019 11:50 AM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for stay of removal, to proceed in forma pauperis, for assignment of pro bono counsel, [3],[3],[3], on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED.[2540451] [19-970] [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:45 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2540448] [19-970] [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:43 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2540446] [19-970] [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:41 PM]
April 12, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION, for stay of removal, to proceed in forma pauperis, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED. Service date 04/09/2019 by US mail.[2540444] [19-970] [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:40 PM]
April 12, 2019 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/21/2019, RECEIVED.[2540438] [19-970] [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:37 PM]
April 12, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Sujit Kumar Das, FILED. [2540434] [19-970] [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Das v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Represented By: Joseph Anthony O'Connell
Represented By: Andrew Nathan O'Malley
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sujit Kumar Das, AKA Edgar Yamil Blanco
Represented By: Sujit Kumar Das
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?