United States of America v. LopezMendez (Morales)
| Gregory Darrain, AKA Sealed Defendant #10, Dennis Smith, AKA Sealed Defendant #12, Gregorio Pizzaro, AKA Sealed Defendant #9, Gavin Ballog, AKA Sealed Defendant #2, Jesus Manuel Lopez-Mendez, AKA Sealed Defendant #1, Bryan Morales, AKA Sealed Defendant #4, Jerry Massa, AKA Sealed Defendant #6, Ariel Massa, AKA Sealed Defendant #7, Michael Calderon, AKA Sealed Defendant #11, Carlos Torres, AKA Sealed Defendant #8 and Juan Santa, AKA Sealed Defendant #5 |
| United States of America |
| Yan Morales, AKA Sealed Defendant #3 |
| 20-1045 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Yan Morales, FILED. Service date 03/25/2020 by CM/ECF.[2808554] [20-1045] [Entered: 03/25/2020 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Yan Morales, FILED. Service date 03/25/2020 by CM/ECF.[2808547] [20-1045] [Entered: 03/25/2020 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTE: See lead case, 20-839, containing complete set of docket entries.[2807809] [20-1045] [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2807803] [20-1045] [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/16/2020, RECEIVED.[2807801] [20-1045] [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Yan Morales, FILED. [2807796] [20-1045] [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
