Almazon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National
| Doina Rosu Almazon |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association |
| 20-1138 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER, dated 05/26/2020, dismissing appeal by 06/09/2020, unless Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, submits the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED.[2846903] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/26/2020 12:08 PM]
|
| Filing 27 CAPTION, edited the name of Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, AMENDED.[2839256] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/14/2020 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., FILED. Service date 05/14/2020 by CM/ECF.[2839168] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/14/2020 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 25 ATTORNEY, Melinda C. Cox, [ # 23 ], in place of attorney Scott W. Parker, SUBSTITUTED.[2839117] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/14/2020 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., FILED.[2839116] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/14/2020 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., FILED. Service date 05/13/2020 by CM/ECF. [2838782] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/13/2020 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance as substitute counsel, [21], on behalf of Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., FILED.[2838668] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/13/2020 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., FILED. Service date 05/13/2020 by CM/ECF. [2838505] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/13/2020 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D, [ # 15 ], on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED.[2831768] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/05/2020 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C, [ # 14 ], on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED.[2831767] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/05/2020 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 15 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED. Service date 05/04/2020 by CM/ECF.[2831468] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/04/2020 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 14 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED. Service date 05/04/2020 by CM/ECF.[2831467] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/04/2020 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [11], on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED.[2831382] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/04/2020 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [10], on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED.[2831359] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/04/2020 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED. Service date 05/04/2020 by CM/ECF.[2831203] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/04/2020 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED. Service date 05/04/2020 by CM/ECF.[2831200] [20-1138] [Entered: 05/04/2020 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 9 CAPTION, edited and corrected the short title, AMENDED.[2814290] [20-1138] [Entered: 04/06/2020 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2813893] [20-1138] [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, district court receipt # ANYSDC-19313831, FILED.[2813891] [20-1138] [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/10/2020, RECEIVED.[2813889] [20-1138] [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Doina Rosu Almazon, FILED. [2813888] [20-1138] [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
