Coston v. Onondaga County Justice Center
Derrick Harris |
Onondaga County Justice Center, Commission of Corrections, State of New York, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department, Appellate Division and Onondaga County Sheriff's Office |
Onondaga County, (Executive), Andrew M. Cuomo, Leticia James, New York State Attorney General and Correction Officers, Deputies, Sergeants, Lieutenant, Chief Custody |
Rashod Coston |
20-1204 |
April 6, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for Appellees.[2869835] [20-1837]--[Edited 06/24/2020 by TT] [Entered: 06/24/2020 12:12 PM] |
Filing 20 NEW CASE 20-1837, on behalf of Rashod Coston, FILED.[2863256] [20-1204] [Entered: 06/16/2020 12:49 PM] |
Filing 19 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2863252] [20-1837] [Entered: 06/16/2020 12:47 PM] |
Filing 18 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2863248] [20-1837] [Entered: 06/16/2020 12:44 PM] |
Filing 17 NOTE: See lead case, 20-1204, containing complete set of docket entries.[2863245] [20-1837] [Entered: 06/16/2020 12:44 PM] |
Filing 16 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2863241] [20-1837] [Entered: 06/16/2020 12:42 PM] |
Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND REMAND APPEAL [ # 13 ],[ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellant Rashod Coston, FILED.[2857136] [20-1204] [Entered: 06/09/2020 06:57 AM] |
Filing 12 ORDER, dated 06/09/2020, dismissing appeal by 7/01/2020, unless Appellant Rashod Coston, submits a Signed Prisoner Authorization form, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2857132] [20-1204] [Entered: 06/09/2020 06:45 AM] |
Filing 11 ORDER, dated 06/09/2020, dismissing appeal by 7/01/2020, unless Appellant Rashod Coston, submits Form D-P, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2857130] [20-1204] [Entered: 06/09/2020 06:35 AM] |
Filing 10 ORDER, dated 06/09/2020, dismissing appeal by 7/01/2020, unless Appellant Rashod Coston, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2857128] [20-1204] [Entered: 06/09/2020 06:29 AM] |
Filing 13 MOTION, to vacate judgment, to remand appeal, on behalf of Appellant Rashod Coston, FILED.[2857135] [20-1204] [Entered: 06/09/2020 06:56 AM] |
Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to vacate and remand, [ # 8 ],[ # 8 ], on behalf of Appellant Rashod Coston, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[2840782] [20-1204] [Entered: 05/18/2020 08:15 AM] |
Filing 8 MOTION, to vacate judgment, to remand appeal, on behalf of Appellant Rashod Coston, FILED. Service date 05/07/2020 by US mail.[2840779] [20-1204] [Entered: 05/18/2020 08:12 AM] |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for Appellees, TERMINATED.[2835830] [20-1204] [Entered: 05/08/2020 05:14 PM] |
Filing 6 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Andrew M. Cuomo and Leticia James, request that you remove this Office as counsel, RECEIVED. Service date 05/04/2020 by US mail.[2832482] [20-1204]--[Edited 05/08/2020 by TT] [Entered: 05/05/2020 04:01 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2818702] [20-1204] [Entered: 04/14/2020 06:35 AM] |
Filing 4 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2818701] [20-1204] [Entered: 04/14/2020 06:33 AM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2818700] [20-1204] [Entered: 04/14/2020 06:30 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, entered in the District Court as docket entry dated 03/10/2020, RECEIVED.[2818699] [20-1204] [Entered: 04/14/2020 06:27 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Rashod Coston, FILED. [2818698] [20-1204] [Entered: 04/14/2020 06:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.