Smith v. State of New York
Adam Vanheyst, Henrietta Town Court District Attorney, Assistant District Attorney Gregory Clark, State of New York, Daryl Pierson, Police Officer, Alan Petrosky, Police Officer #3, Police Officer Matt Bennetti, Assistant Disrict Attorney Kevin Fitzgerald and Kristine Merrick, Monroe County District Attorney |
Wendell Smith |
Michael Mumm, Deputy Sheriff, Monroe County |
20-1291 |
April 16, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for , on behalf of Appellee Michael Mumm, FILED. Service date 05/01/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2830651] [20-1291] [Entered: 05/01/2020 05:15 PM] |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Michael Mumm, FILED. Service date 04/29/2020 by CM/ECF.[2829105] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/29/2020 07:53 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2822174] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/20/2020 11:08 AM] |
Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2822173] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/20/2020 11:06 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2822169] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/20/2020 11:04 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/01/2020, RECEIVED.[2822167] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/20/2020 11:04 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 04/01/2020, RECEIVED.[2822166] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/20/2020 11:03 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Wendell Smith, FILED. [2822156] [20-1291] [Entered: 04/20/2020 10:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.