Bangladesh Bank v. Rizal Commercial Banking Corpo
Philrem Service Corp., Centurytex Trading, Nestor O. Pineda, Ismael S. Reyes, Weikang Xu, Michael Bautista, Gao Shuhua, John Does 1-25, Ding Zhize, Salud Bautista, Angela Ruth Torres, Romualdo S. Agarrado, Lorenzo V. Tan, William So Go, Raul Victor B. Tan, Brigitte R. Capina and Maia Santos Deguito |
Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels, Inc., DBA Solaire Resort & Casino, Kam Sin Wong, AKA Kim Wong, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation and Eastern Hawaii Leisure Company, Ltd., DBA Midas Hotel & Casino |
Bangladesh Bank |
20-1470 |
May 1, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTE: See lead case, 20-1470, containing complete set of docket entries.[2832239] [20-1470] [Entered: 05/05/2020 01:34 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2832236] [20-1470] [Entered: 05/05/2020 01:32 PM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels, Inc., Eastern Hawaii Leisure Company, Ltd., Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation and Kam Sin Wong, district court receipt # ANYSDC-19675781, FILED.[2832220] [20-1470] [Entered: 05/05/2020 01:19 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION & ORDER, dated 03/20/2020, RECEIVED.[2832215] [20-1470] [Entered: 05/05/2020 01:17 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL CROSS APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels, Inc., Eastern Hawaii Leisure Company, Ltd., Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation and Kam Sin Wong, FILED. [2832205] [20-1470] [Entered: 05/05/2020 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.