Chen v. Barr
| Zhiming Chen, AKA Zhi Ming Chen |
| William P. Barr |
| 20-1610 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2844264] [20-1610] [Entered: 05/20/2020 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 04/21/2020, RECEIVED.[2844243] [20-1610] [Entered: 05/20/2020 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Zhiming Chen, FILED. [2844223] [20-1610] [Entered: 05/20/2020 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Chen v. Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Zhiming Chen, AKA Zhi Ming Chen | |
| Represented By: | Doen Zheng Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William P. Barr | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
