United States of America v. Mattis
Urooj Rahman and Colinford Mattis |
United States of America |
20-1713 |
June 2, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 REPLY TO OPPOSITION [ # 21 ], [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/03/2020 by CM/ECF.[2853455][25] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/03/2020 12:13 PM] |
Filing 23 OPPOSITION TO MOTION to stay [ # 3 ], on behalf of Appellee Colinford Mattis, FILED. Service date 06/03/2020 by email. [2853225][23] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/03/2020 09:54 AM] |
Filing 21 OPPOSITION TO MOTION, [ # 3 ], on behalf of Appellee Urooj Rahman, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF. [2852949] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 09:23 PM] |
Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Urooj Rahman, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF.[2852947] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 09:18 PM] |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Kevin Trowel for Appellant United States of America, in case 20-1713 , [ # 16 ], ADDED.[2852809] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:40 PM] |
Filing 18 ATTORNEY, Jonathan Edgar Algor IV for Appellant United States of America, in case 20-1713 , [ # 15 ], ADDED.[2852801] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:38 PM] |
Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Ian Craig Richardson for Appellant United States of America, in case 20-1713 , [ # 14 ], ADDED.[2852793] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:31 PM] |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF. [2852769] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:19 PM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF. [2852764] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:16 PM] |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF. [2852763] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:14 PM] |
Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF.[2852760] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:11 PM] |
Filing 12 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF.[2852756] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:09 PM] |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY, Paul L. Shechtman for Appellee Urooj Rahman, in case 20-1713 , [ # 10 ], ADDED.[2852735] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 03:55 PM] |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Urooj Rahman, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF. [2852673] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 03:22 PM] |
Filing 8 LETTER, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, regarding transcripts of bail appeal hearing, RECEIVED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF.[2852603] [20-1713]--[Edited 06/02/2020 by TT] [Entered: 06/02/2020 02:45 PM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2852510] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:40 PM] |
Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT SEALED ORDER, dated 06/01/2020, RECEIVED.[2852505] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:39 PM] |
Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION, to stay, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/02/2020 by CM/ECF. [2852503] [20-1713]--[Edited 06/02/2020 by TT] [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:38 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT SEALED ORDER, dated 06/01/2020, RECEIVED.[2852502] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:37 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant United States of America, FILED. [2852492] [20-1713] [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.