Narvaez v. United States of America
Petitioner: Pedro Narvaez
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 20-1880
Filed: June 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2020 Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2865154] [20-1880] [Entered: 06/18/2020 09:36 AM]
June 15, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION, to file successive petition, on behalf of Petitioner Pedro Narvaez, FILED. Service date 06/05/2020 by US mail.[2865148] [20-1880] [Entered: 06/18/2020 09:34 AM]
June 15, 2020 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, on behalf of Petitioner Pedro Narvaez, FILED.[2865132] [20-1880] [Entered: 06/18/2020 09:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Narvaez v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pedro Narvaez
Represented By: Pedro Narvaez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Won S. Shin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?