Ragin v. Riverbay Corporation
Riverbay Corporation |
Colette D. Ragin |
20-2233 |
July 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 CAMP ORDER (v), Type of Conference: Amended Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 09/14/2020, Start Time: 10:00 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Mediator: Alida Camp, ENTERED.[2918598] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/27/2020 04:24 PM] |
Filing 25 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Colette D. Ragin Brief due date as 10/23/2020. Joint Appendix due date as 10/23/2020, FILED.[2905440] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/11/2020 03:38 PM] |
Filing 22 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Colette D. Ragin, informing Court of proposed due date 10/23/2020, RECEIVED. Service date 08/11/2020 by CM/ECF.[2905111] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/11/2020 12:02 PM] |
Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER, Evelyn Cruz, ASSIGNED.[2905049] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/11/2020 11:24 AM] |
Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Riverbay Corporation, FILED. Service date 08/10/2020 by CM/ECF.[2904135] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/10/2020 12:58 PM] |
Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Colette D. Ragin, FILED. Service date 08/10/2020 by CM/ECF.[2903629] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/10/2020 08:48 AM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE, to Appellee Riverbay Corporation, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2903619] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/10/2020 08:26 AM] |
![]() |
Filing 13 CAMP ORDER (v), Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 09/08/2020, Start Time: 10:00 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Mediator: Alida Camp, ENTERED.[2902825] [20-2233] [Entered: 08/07/2020 09:15 AM] |
Filing 10 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Colette D. Ragin, FILED. Service date 07/27/2020 by CM/ECF.[2893111] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/27/2020 02:29 PM] |
Filing 9 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Colette D. Ragin, FILED. Service date 07/27/2020 by CM/ECF.[2893108] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/27/2020 02:27 PM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2885309] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:25 PM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Colette D. Ragin, district court receipt # ANYSDC-20659224., FILED.[2885306] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:25 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 06/24/2020, RECEIVED.[2885305] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:24 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 06/22/2020, RECEIVED.[2885302] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:23 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Colette D. Ragin, FILED. [2885298] [20-2233] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ragin v. Riverbay Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Riverbay Corporation | |
Represented By: | Joseph A. Saccomano Esq. Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Colette D. Ragin | |
Represented By: | Michael H. Sussman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.