Marlowe v. Bennett
Petitioner: Thomas H. Marlowe
Respondent: Floyd Bennett
Case Number: 20-2270
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2020 Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2887429] [20-2270] [Entered: 07/17/2020 04:19 PM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 2 SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, transferred from U.S. District Court, FILED. Notice to Petitioner Thomas H. Marlowe, requiring filing of application form for second or successive petition, SENT.[2887410] [20-2270] [Entered: 07/17/2020 04:13 PM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, on behalf of Petitioner Thomas H. Marlowe, FILED.[2887400] [20-2270] [Entered: 07/17/2020 04:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marlowe v. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas H. Marlowe
Represented By: Thomas H. Marlowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Floyd Bennett
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?