Gluck v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
| Sandra Prusock and Laurence Gluck |
| Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
| 20-2844 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Richard L. Parker, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Gilbert S. Rothenberg, SUBSTITUTED.[2920736] [20-2844] [Entered: 09/01/2020 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue, FILED. Service date 08/31/2020 by CM/ECF. [2920581] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/31/2020 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Laurence Gluck and Sandra Prusock, FILED.[2920153] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/31/2020 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Bob G. Goldberg, Esq. for Appellant Laurence Gluck and Sandra Prusock, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[2919435] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/28/2020 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2919257] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/28/2020 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 TAX COURT ORDER, dated 05/26/2020, RECEIVED.[2919217] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/28/2020 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 TAX COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION, dated 05/26/2020, RECEIVED.[2919216] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/28/2020 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF TAX COURT APPEAL, with copy of tax court docket, on behalf of Appellant Laurence Gluck and Sandra Prusock, FILED. [2919186] [20-2844] [Entered: 08/28/2020 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
