Shrestha v. Barr
Dinesh Shrestha and Sabita Shrestha |
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General |
20-2995 |
September 2, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Dinesh Shrestha and Sabita Shrestha, FILED. Service date 09/04/2020 by CM/ECF.[2924787] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/04/2020 10:23 PM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Anthony Cardozo Payne for William P. Barr, in case 20-2995 , [ # 7 ], ADDED.[2924223] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/04/2020 12:24 PM] |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Raya Jarawan, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney Lisa Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2924222] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/04/2020 12:23 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 09/04/2020 by CM/ECF. [2924215] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/04/2020 12:20 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 09/04/2020 by CM/ECF. [2924199] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/04/2020 12:14 PM] |
Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2923678] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/03/2020 05:02 PM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Dinesh Shrestha and Sabita Shrestha, USCA receipt # A02-81597-19, FILED.[2923675] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/03/2020 05:00 PM] |
Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 08/06/2020, RECEIVED.[2923674] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/03/2020 05:00 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Dinesh Shrestha and Sabita Shrestha, FILED. [2923671] [20-2995] [Entered: 09/03/2020 04:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.