United States of America v. Thai
| Jimmy Nguyen, Tam Thanh Do, Tuan Lee, Minh Do, Lan Ngoc Tran, Quang Van Nguyen, Bao Hung Tran, L.V. Hong, Dat Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Nigel Jagmohan and Tan Lai |
| United States of America |
| David Thai |
| 20-3226 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 09/25/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2939167] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/25/2020 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Gillian Kassner, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[2939152] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 09/25/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2939138] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2937844] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/24/2020 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2937838] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/24/2020 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 06/01/2020, RECEIVED.[2937831] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/24/2020 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 04/27/2020, RECEIVED.[2937830] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/24/2020 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant David Thai, FILED. [2937826] [20-3226] [Entered: 09/24/2020 12:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
