Matos v. Garland
Petitioner: JESUS TURBI MATOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 20-3381
Filed: October 5, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2022 Filing 24 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 11/08/2021, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 01/03/2022 10:45:00 AM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 23 APPEAL, pursuant to court order, dated 11/08/2021, DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:38:00 PM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 22 MOTION ORDER, denying to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 15, denying motion for stay of removal at docket entry 7, on behalf of Petitioner Jesus Turbi Matos, denying motion to expedite appeal, at docket entry 19, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, by GC, BDP, MHP, FILED. [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:27:00 PM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 21 NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 11/08/2021 02:28:00 PM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 20 NAC MOTION, to proceed informa pauperis status and stay of removal, GC, BDP, MHP, SUBMITTED. [Entered: 11/08/2021 12:57:00 PM]
March 19, 2021 Filing 19 MOTION, to expedite appeal, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:32:00 PM]
March 17, 2021 Filing 18 CAPTION, U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland has been added as the Respondent, AMENDED. [Entered: 03/17/2021 10:26:00 AM]
March 15, 2021 Filing 17 Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, replaced by Merrick B. Garland, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 3/15/2021 05:33:08 PM]
December 28, 2020 Filing 16 William P. Barr, Respondent, replaced by Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 05:55:57 PM]
December 17, 2020 Filing 15 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner Jesus Matos, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2020 07:24:29 AM]
December 17, 2020 Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Jesus Matos, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2020 07:23:13 AM]
December 17, 2020 Filing 13 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Jesus Matos, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2020 07:20:37 AM]
November 6, 2020 Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 11/05/2020 08:22:37 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 11 OPPOSITION, to motion [-], on behalf of Respondent William Barr, Counsel for Respondent Lindsay Marshall, FILED. [Entered: 10/16/2020 05:36:30 PM]
October 14, 2020 Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Lindsay Marshall in place of attorney Lisa Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 10/14/2020 10:00:41 AM]
October 14, 2020 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Robert Graziano, on behalf of Petitioner Jesus Matos, ADDED. [Entered: 10/14/2020 09:50:33 AM]
October 13, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 10/13/2020 04:59:56 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 Motion, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Jesus Matos, FILED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:46:36 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:29:15 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petioner Jesus Matos, OPENED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:16:50 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 Office of Immigration Litigation for Respondent Willam P. Barr, ADDED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:05:34 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Robert F. Graziano, on behalf of Jesus Matos, ADDED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:01:44 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 02:55:13 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Jesus Matos, FILED. [Entered: 10/05/2020 02:55:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matos v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JESUS TURBI MATOS
Represented By: Robert F. Graziano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Lindsay Marshall
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Represented By: Lindsay Marshall
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Lindsay Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?