Torres v. New York Legal Assistance Grou
Defendant / Appellee: Robyn Tarnofsky, Director of the Legal Clinic, New York Legal Assistance Group, Jill Rosenberg, CEO, New York Legal Assistance Group, New York Legal Assistance Group and Beth Goldman, President, New York Legal Assistance Group
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wilfredo Torres
Case Number: 20-3383
Filed: October 5, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2020 Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [19], on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2982534] [20-3383] [Entered: 11/25/2020 07:44 PM]
November 25, 2020 Filing 19 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, FILED. Service date 11/24/2020 by US mail.[2982533] [20-3383] [Entered: 11/25/2020 07:43 PM]
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER, dated 11/12/2020, dismissing appeal by 12/04/2020, unless Appellant Wilfredo Torres, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2973449] [20-3383] [Entered: 11/12/2020 07:55 PM]
November 12, 2020 Filing 17 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Wilfredo Torres, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], [11] from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2973447] [20-3383] [Entered: 11/12/2020 07:51 PM]
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER, dated 10/26/2020, dismissing appeal by 11/16/2020, unless Appellant Wilfredo Torres, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2960303] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:13 PM]
October 26, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE, to Appellees Beth Goldman, New York Legal Assistance Group, Jill Rosenberg and Robyn Tarnofsky, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2960296] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:09 PM]
October 19, 2020 Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [11], on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2955103] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/19/2020 01:28 PM]
October 19, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, FILED. Service date 10/18/2020 by US mail.[2955099] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/19/2020 01:26 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION, for reverse dismissal, on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, FILED. Service date 10/15/2020 by US mail.[2954260] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/16/2020 03:24 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Wilfredo Torres, FILED. Service date 10/15/2020 by US mail.[2954258] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/16/2020 03:22 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2945425] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:38 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2945422] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:36 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2945413] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:31 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, FILED. Service date 10/02/2020 by US mail.[2945411] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:30 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/23/2020, RECEIVED.[2945409] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:29 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 09/23/2020, RECEIVED.[2945406] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:28 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Wilfredo Torres, FILED. [2945402] [20-3383] [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:25 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Torres v. New York Legal Assistance Grou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Robyn Tarnofsky, Director of the Legal Clinic, New York Legal Assistance Group
Represented By: Robyn Faith Tarnofsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jill Rosenberg, CEO, New York Legal Assistance Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: New York Legal Assistance Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Beth Goldman, President, New York Legal Assistance Group
Represented By: Beth E. Goldman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Wilfredo Torres
Represented By: Wilfredo Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?