Rose v. United States of America
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant: Floyd Rose
Case Number: 20-34
Filed: January 3, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2020 Filing 18 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, to USCA from USPS, RECEIVED.[2787642] [20-34] [Entered: 02/26/2020 02:48 PM]
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, dated 02/05/2020, dismissing appeal by 02/26/2020, unless Appellant Floyd Rose, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [2770929] [20-34] [Entered: 02/05/2020 02:54 PM]
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER, dated 02/05/2020, dismissing appeal by 02/26/2020, unless appellant Floyd Rose, submits form Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [2770865] [20-34] [Entered: 02/05/2020 02:21 PM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to extend time, to hold appeal in abeyance, [11],[11], on behalf of Appellant Floyd Rose, FILED.[2765483] [20-34] [Entered: 01/30/2020 11:31 AM]
January 28, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION, to extend time, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Appellant Floyd Rose, FILED. Service date 01/23/2020 by US mail.[2765465] [20-34] [Entered: 01/30/2020 11:25 AM]
January 28, 2020 Filing 10 PAPERS, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Form 7. Declaration of Inmate Filing, RECEIVED.[2764986] [20-34] [Entered: 01/29/2020 05:10 PM]
January 28, 2020 Filing 9 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Floyd Rose, FILED. Service date 01/23/2020 by US mail.[2764981] [20-34] [Entered: 01/29/2020 05:06 PM]
January 13, 2020 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Frank Balsamello for United States of America, in case 20-34 , [ # 7 ], ADDED.[2750066] [20-34] [Entered: 01/13/2020 09:11 AM]
January 10, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 01/10/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2749948] [20-34] [Entered: 01/10/2020 08:30 PM]
January 7, 2020 Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2746035] [20-34] [Entered: 01/07/2020 04:13 PM]
January 3, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2746025] [20-34] [Entered: 01/07/2020 04:10 PM]
January 3, 2020 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 12/03/2019, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[2745956] [20-34] [Entered: 01/07/2020 03:42 PM]
January 3, 2020 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 12/03/2019, RECEIVED.[2745935] [20-34] [Entered: 01/07/2020 03:33 PM]
January 3, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Floyd Rose, FILED. [2745917] [20-34] [Entered: 01/07/2020 03:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rose v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Sarah Kathleen Eddy
Represented By: Frank Balsamello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Floyd Rose
Represented By: Floyd Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?