Montes v. James
Letitia A. James, Attorney General of New York State |
Germaine Montes |
20-3423 |
October 5, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 APPEAL, pursuant to court order, dated 11/17/2020, DISMISSED.[2976120] [20-3423] [Entered: 11/17/2020 12:05 PM] |
Filing 20 ORDER, dated 11/17/2020, dismissing for lack of jurisdiction, by DJ, RSP, JFB, copy to pro se, FILED.[2976112] [20-3423] [Entered: 11/17/2020 12:01 PM] |
Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED.[2976074] [20-1168, 20-3423] [Entered: 11/17/2020 11:45 AM] |
Filing 15 ORDER, dated 10/27/2020, dismissing appeal by 11/17/2020, unless Appellant Germaine Montes, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2961408] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/27/2020 02:28 PM] |
Filing 14 ORDER, dated 10/27/2020, dismissing appeal 11/17/2020, unless Appellant Germaine Montes, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2961390] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/27/2020 02:21 PM] |
Filing 11 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF APPEARANACE FOR SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [ # 8 ], [ # 9 ], on behalf of Appellee Letitia A. James, FILED.[2947633] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/08/2020 07:43 AM] |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Paul B. Lyons, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2947631] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/08/2020 07:42 AM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Letitia A. James, FILED. Service date 10/07/2020 by US mail. [2947617] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/07/2020 10:02 PM] |
Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance for Substitute Counsel, [7], on behalf of Appellee Letitia A. James, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2947612] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/07/2020 09:09 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Letitia A. James in 20-3423, 20-1168, FILED. Service date 10/07/2020 by US mail. [2947580] [20-3423, 20-1168] [Entered: 10/07/2020 06:42 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[2946817] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/07/2020 08:31 AM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2946815] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/07/2020 08:29 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/02/2020, RECEIVED.[2946812] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/07/2020 08:27 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 09/02/2020, RECEIVED.[2946811] [20-3423] [Entered: 10/07/2020 08:27 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Germaine Montes in 20-3423, FILED. [2946806] [20-3423, 20-1168] [Entered: 10/07/2020 08:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Montes v. James | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Letitia A. James, Attorney General of New York State | |
Represented By: | Paul Bernard Lyons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Germaine Montes | |
Represented By: | Germaine Montes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.