James v. United States of America
United States of America |
Kent Adam James |
20-3443 |
October 6, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to extend time, [20], on behalf of Appellant Kent Adam James, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2978159] [20-3443] [Entered: 11/19/2020 01:28 PM] |
Filing 20 MOTION, to extend time, on behalf of Appellant Kent Adam James, FILED. No service.[2978158] [20-3443] [Entered: 11/19/2020 01:27 PM] |
Filing 19 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2968041] [20-3443] [Entered: 11/04/2020 04:35 PM] |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF DUPLICATE APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Kent Adam James, FILED. [2968039] [20-3443] [Entered: 11/04/2020 04:34 PM] |
Filing 13 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Kent Adam James, FILED. Service date 10/20/2020 by US mail.[2962287] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/28/2020 11:53 AM] |
Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Kent Adam James, FILED. Service date 10/20/2020 by US mail.[2962281] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/28/2020 11:47 AM] |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Kent Adam James, FILED. Service date 10/20/2020 by US mail.[2962280] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/28/2020 11:46 AM] |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Kimberly J. Ravener for United States of America, in case 20-3443, [ # 9 ], ADDED.[2961773] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/27/2020 04:41 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/27/2020 by US mail. [2961471] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/27/2020 02:47 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE, to Appellee United States of America, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2961245] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/27/2020 01:08 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER, dated 10/27/2020, dismissing appeal by 11/17/2020 unless Appellant Kent Adam James submits Acknowledgement and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se, FILED.[2961160] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/27/2020 12:29 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2947870] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:42 AM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2947756] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/08/2020 09:29 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 07/07/2020, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[2947723] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/08/2020 09:19 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 07/07/2020, RECEIVED.[2947722] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/08/2020 09:18 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Kent Adam James, FILED. [2947684] [20-3443] [Entered: 10/08/2020 08:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Won S. Shin |
Represented By: | Kimberly J. Ravener Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Kent Adam James | |
Represented By: | Kent Adam James |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.