Schwartz v. Connelly
| Ekkehart Schwartz |
| Superintendent William Connelly, Fishkill Correctional Facility |
| 20-3489 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 OPPOSITION TO MOTION, [ # 13 ], [ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellee William Connelly, FILED. Service date 10/29/2020 by CM/ECF. [2963506] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/29/2020 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, [ # 12 ], [ # 13 ],[ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED.[2954891] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/19/2020 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED. Service date 10/19/2020 by CM/ECF. [2954847] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/19/2020 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for Certificate of Appealability, [ # 10 ],[ # 10 ], on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED.[2951440] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/14/2020 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED. Service date 10/13/2020 by CM/ECF. [2950950] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED. Service date 10/13/2020 by CM/ECF.[2950804] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED. Service date 10/13/2020 by CM/ECF.[2950786] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED. Service date 10/13/2020 by CM/ECF.[2950707] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Priscilla Steward, [ # 5 ], in place of attorney Barbara Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2950695] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee William Connelly, FILED. Service date 10/13/2020 by CM/ECF. [2950649] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2950090] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/10/2020, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[2950085] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/10/2020, RECEIVED.[2950081] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ekkehart Schwartz, FILED. [2950076] [20-3489] [Entered: 10/13/2020 09:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Schwartz v. Connelly | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Ekkehart Schwartz | |
| Represented By: | Ellen Dille Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Superintendent William Connelly, Fishkill Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | Priscilla Steward |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
