United States of America v. Raniere (Bronfman)
Lauren Salzman, Nancy Salzman, AKA Perfect, Allison Mack, Keith Raniere, AKA Vanguard and Kathy Russell |
United States of America |
Clare Bronfman |
20-3520 |
October 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER, dated 10/28/2020, dismissing appeal by 11/12/2020, unless Appellant Clare Bronfman, submits form B, FILED.[2961923] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/28/2020 01:16 AM] |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/16/2020 by CM/ECF.[2954155] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/16/2020 01:47 PM] |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Tanya Hajjar, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[2953489] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/15/2020 07:39 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/15/2020 by CM/ECF. [2953327] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/15/2020 03:57 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2952534] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:58 AM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Clare Bronfman, district court receipt # ANYEDC-13498113, FILED.[2952532] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:57 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/07/2020, RECEIVED.[2952530] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:56 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Clare Bronfman, FILED. [2952518] [20-3520] [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.