Richardson v. City of New York
Defendant: Police Officer John Doe, 1, New York City Police Department, 30th Precinct, Police Officer John Doe, 3 and Police Officer John Doe, 2
Defendant / Appellee: Sergeant Wilson Quiles, Shield # 4067, Police Detective Ericks Rodriguez, Shield #4675, Police Detective Carlos Pagan and City of New York
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dewayne Joaquin Richardson
Case Number: 20-3560
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER, dated 12/14/2020, dismissing appeal by 01/25/2021, unless Appellant submits brief, copy to pro se, FILED.[2993280] [20-3560] [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:47 PM]
December 7, 2020 Filing 28 NEW CASE MANAGER, Jessica Mckenzie, copy to pro se, ASSIGNED.[2988155] [20-3560] [Entered: 12/07/2020 03:58 PM]
November 16, 2020 Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM [ # 15 ], [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellant Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, FILED.[2974662] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/16/2020 07:52 AM]
November 13, 2020 Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, FILED. Service date 11/13/2020 by US mail.[2974661] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/16/2020 07:49 AM]
November 5, 2020 Filing 20 ATTORNEY, Susan Paulson, for Police Detective Ericks Rodriguez, Shield #4675, Police Detective Carlos Pagan, Sergeant Wilson Quiles, Shield # 4067, TERMINATED.[2968356] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/05/2020 10:00 AM]
November 5, 2020 Filing 19 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee City of New York, respectfully requests that it no longer be identified as counsel for defendants Rodriguez, Pagan, and Quiles on the docket for this appeal, RECEIVED. Service date 11/04/2020 by US mail.[2968243] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/05/2020 08:57 AM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 18 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis as unnecessary. Appellant was granted IFP status by the district court which has not been revoked [ # 12 ] filed by Appellant Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [2965931][18] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 04:11 PM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 16 CERTIFIED PRISONER AUTHORIZATION FORM, dated 11/02/2020, to Vernon C. Bain Center, in care of Warden, ISSUED.[2965507] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 11:38 AM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [9], on behalf of Appellant Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2965474] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 11:13 AM]
October 30, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, FILED. Service date 10/23/2020 by US mail.[2965451] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:59 AM]
October 30, 2020 Filing 11 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 10/23/2020 by US mail.[2965433] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:48 AM]
October 30, 2020 Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, FILED. Service date 10/23/2020 by US mail.[2965421] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:40 AM]
October 30, 2020 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, FILED. Service date 10/23/2020 by US mail.[2965369] [20-3560] [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:15 AM]
October 28, 2020 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Susan Paulson, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney James E. Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[2962679] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:48 PM]
October 28, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of New York, FILED. Service date 10/28/2020 by US mail. [2962674] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:45 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2954516] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/16/2020 07:13 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2954515] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/16/2020 07:10 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2954514] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/16/2020 07:07 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 09/29/2020, RECEIVED.[2954513] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/16/2020 07:06 PM]
October 16, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Dewayne Joaquin Richardson, FILED. [2954512] [20-3560] [Entered: 10/16/2020 06:56 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richardson v. City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer John Doe, 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Police Department, 30th Precinct
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer John Doe, 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer John Doe, 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Sergeant Wilson Quiles, Shield # 4067
Represented By: James Edward Johnson Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Police Detective Ericks Rodriguez, Shield #4675
Represented By: James Edward Johnson Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Police Detective Carlos Pagan
Represented By: James Edward Johnson Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of New York
Represented By: James Edward Johnson Esq.
Represented By: Susan Paulson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Dewayne Joaquin Richardson
Represented By: Dewayne Joaquin Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?