Morris v. United States of America
Leslie Morris |
United States of America |
20-3589 |
October 15, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2955918] [20-3589] [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:46 AM] |
Filing 2 MOTION, to file successive petition, on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Morris, FILED. Service date 09/30/2020 by US mail.[2955912] [20-3589] [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:42 AM] |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, on behalf of Petitioner Leslie Morris, FILED.[2955871] [20-3589] [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Morris v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Sandra Slack Glover |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Leslie Morris | |
Represented By: | Leslie Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.