28th Highline Associates, L.L. v. Roache
| 28th Highline Associates, L.L.C. |
| Iain Roache |
| 20-3597 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Iain Roache, FILED. Service date 11/20/2020 by US mail.[2986154] [20-3597] [Entered: 12/03/2020 04:17 PM] |
Filing 19
ORDER, dated 12/03/2020, dismissing appeal by 12/28/2020, unless Appellant Iain Roache, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2985693] [20-3597] [Entered: 12/03/2020 11:37 AM]
|
| Filing 18 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Iain Roache, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [9], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2985687] [20-3597] [Entered: 12/03/2020 11:34 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 11/12/2020, dismissing appeal by 12/03/2020, unless Appellant Iain Roache, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2973095] [20-3597] [Entered: 11/12/2020 02:34 PM]
|
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee 28th Highline Associates, L.L.C., FILED. Service date 11/06/2020 by 3rd party.[2969622] [20-3597] [Entered: 11/06/2020 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE, to Appellee 28th Highline Associates, L.L.C., for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2969160] [20-3597] [Entered: 11/06/2020 01:13 AM] |
| Filing 11 PAPERS, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, RECEIVED.[2969159] [20-3597] [Entered: 11/06/2020 01:12 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [9], on behalf of Appellant Iain Roache, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2968150] [20-3597] [Entered: 11/04/2020 10:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Iain Roache, FILED. Service date 11/04/2020 by email.[2968149] [20-3597] [Entered: 11/04/2020 10:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Iain Roache, district court receipt # 465401268662, FILED.[2958747] [20-3597] [Entered: 10/23/2020 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2956616] [20-3597] [Entered: 10/20/2020 06:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2956614] [20-3597] [Entered: 10/20/2020 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/23/2020, RECEIVED.[2956612] [20-3597] [Entered: 10/20/2020 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Iain Roache, FILED. [2956608] [20-3597] [Entered: 10/20/2020 06:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: 28th Highline Associates, L.L. v. Roache | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: 28th Highline Associates, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Emily S. Reisbaum Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Counter claimant: Iain Roache | |
| Represented By: | Iain Roache |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
