Raydo v. City of New York
| New York City Police Officer John Doe #1, individually, the names "John Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown and New York City Police Officers John and Jane Does #2-#10, individually, the names John Doe" and "Jane Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown |
| Melanie Raydo and Daniel Lang |
| New York City Police Officer Eric Rodriguez, individually and City of New York |
| 20-3685 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MANDATE RECEIPT, from SDNY, RECEIVED.[2973775] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/13/2020 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 16 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 11/12/2020, determining the appeal to SDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][2973224] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to withdraw appeal [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Melanie Raydo and Daniel Lang, FILED. [2973223][15] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 NEW CASE MANAGER, Khadijah Young, ASSIGNED.[2973211] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Lang and Melanie Raydo, FILED. Service date 11/11/2020 by CM/ECF. [2972298] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/11/2020 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Remy Green for Melanie Raydo Daniel Lang, in case 20-3685, [ # 8 ], ADDED.[2969057] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Lang and Melanie Raydo, FILED. Service date 11/05/2020 by CM/ECF. [2968946] [20-3685] [Entered: 11/05/2020 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Jeremy W. Shweder, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney James E. Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[2965033] [20-3685] [Entered: 10/30/2020 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of New York and Eric Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 10/30/2020 by CM/ECF. [2964978] [20-3685] [Entered: 10/30/2020 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Moira Meltzer-Cohen, Esq. for Appellant Melanie Raydo and Daniel Lang, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[2962708] [20-3685] [Entered: 10/28/2020 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2962703] [20-3685] [Entered: 10/28/2020 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 10/06/2020, RECEIVED.[2962701] [20-3685] [Entered: 10/28/2020 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Lang and Melanie Raydo, FILED. [2962690] [20-3685] [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raydo v. City of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Melanie Raydo | |
| Represented By: | Moira Meltzer-Cohen Esq. |
| Represented By: | Remy Green Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Daniel Lang | |
| Represented By: | Moira Meltzer-Cohen Esq. |
| Represented By: | Remy Green Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New York City Police Officer John Doe #1, individually, the names "John Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New York City Police Officers John and Jane Does #2-#10, individually, the names John Doe" and "Jane Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: New York City Police Officer Eric Rodriguez, individually | |
| Represented By: | James Edward Johnson Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jeremy W. Shweder Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: City of New York | |
| Represented By: | James Edward Johnson Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jeremy W. Shweder Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
