Nieves v. The City of New York
| Michael Nieves |
| The City of New York |
| 20-3875 |
| November 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 12/22/2020, to Bellevue Hospital Center, in care of Warden, ISSUED.[2998951] [20-3875] [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 21 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 12/10/2020 by US mail.[2998921] [20-3875] [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:31 AM] |
Filing 20
ORDER, dated 12/11/2020, dismissing appeal by 01/01/2021, unless Appellant Michael Nieves, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2992201] [20-3875] [Entered: 12/11/2020 01:39 PM]
|
| Filing 19 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Michael Nieves Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ] from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2992184] [20-3875] [Entered: 12/11/2020 01:30 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 12/10/2020, dismissing appeal by 12/31/2020, unless Michael Nieves, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2991218] [20-3875] [Entered: 12/10/2020 01:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 12/10/2020, dismissing appeal by 12/31/2020, unless Michael Nieves, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2991213] [20-3875] [Entered: 12/10/2020 01:27 PM]
|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, James Edward Johnson, for Appellee The City of New York, TERMINATED.[2982980] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER, dated 11/30/2020, on behalf of Appellee The City of New York, regarding correct counsel on record, RECEIVED. Service date 11/30/2020 by US mail.[2982977] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 6 ], on behalf of Appellant Michael Nieves, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2976559] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2976549] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2976540] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Michael Nieves, FILED. No service.[2976539] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2976531] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/16/2020, RECEIVED.[2976523] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael Nieves, FILED. [2976518] [20-3875] [Entered: 11/17/2020 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nieves v. The City of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Michael Nieves | |
| Represented By: | Michael Nieves |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: The City of New York | |
| Represented By: | James Edward Johnson Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
