Beato v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
Petitioner / Appellant: Angel Beato
Respondent / Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Case Number: 20-3896
Filed: November 18, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2021 Filing 19 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 01/08/2021, determining the appeal to US TAX COURT, copy sent to pro se, ISSUED.[Mandate][3057029] [20-3896] [Entered: 03/16/2021 12:07 PM]
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER, [ # 12 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Angel Beato failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE.[3042159] [20-3896] [Entered: 02/23/2021 12:02 PM]
February 23, 2021 Filing 17 NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED.[3042142] [20-3896] [Entered: 02/23/2021 11:55 AM]
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, dated 01/08/2021, dismissing appeal by 01/29/2021, unless Appellant Angel Beato, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3009506] [20-3896] [Entered: 01/08/2021 01:16 PM]
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, dated 01/07/2021, dismissing appeal by 01/29/2021, unless Appellant Angel Beato, submits the Acknowledmgent and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3008892] [20-3896] [Entered: 01/07/2021 06:19 PM]
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, dated 01/07/2021, dismissing appeal by 01/29/2021, unless Appellant Angel Beato, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3008884] [20-3896] [Entered: 01/07/2021 06:12 PM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Karen G. Gregory, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Gilbert S. Rothenberg, SUBSTITUTED.[2984998] [20-3896] [Entered: 12/02/2020 02:45 PM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue, FILED. Service date 12/02/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2984796] [20-3896] [Entered: 12/02/2020 11:48 AM]
November 19, 2020 Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ON APPEAL, FILED.[2978450] [20-3896] [Entered: 11/19/2020 04:22 PM]
November 19, 2020 Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2977769] [20-3896] [Entered: 11/19/2020 09:13 AM]
November 18, 2020 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2977764] [20-3896] [Entered: 11/19/2020 09:09 AM]
November 18, 2020 Filing 2 TAX COURT ORDER AND DECISION, dated 10/15/2020, RECEIVED.[2977761] [20-3896] [Entered: 11/19/2020 09:08 AM]
November 18, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF TAX COURT APPEAL, with copy of tax court docket, on behalf of Appellant Angel Beato, FILED. [2977757] [20-3896] [Entered: 11/19/2020 09:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Beato v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Angel Beato
Represented By: Angel Beato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Represented By: Gilbert Steven Rothenberg
Represented By: Karen G. Gregory Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?