Fredericks v. Doe
Captain John Smith, #1651, individually and in their official capacities, Deputy Officer John Doe, individually and in their official capacities, Captain Officer John Doe, individually and in their official capacities, Correction Officer John Doe, Correction Officer John Richardson, #18595, individually and in their official capacities, Captain or Deputy John Doe, Correction Officer John Doe, Post A, individually and in their official capacities and Correction Officer John Shaheen, #5258, individually and in their official capacities |
Nigel Fredericks |
20-3918 |
November 17, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, [25], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3002337] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 11:27 AM] |
Filing 29 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Prison Litigation Reform Act Authorization Form, [24], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3002317] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 11:21 AM] |
Filing 28 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [23], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3002290] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 11:06 AM] |
Filing 27 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [22], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3002264] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:55 AM] |
Filing 26 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, FILED. Service date 12/15/2020 by US mail.[3002257] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:52 AM] |
Filing 25 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, informing Court of proposed due date 12/25/2020, RECEIVED. No service date.[3002252] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:49 AM] |
Filing 24 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. No service date.[3002251] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:47 AM] |
Filing 23 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, FILED. No service date.[3002248] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:46 AM] |
Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, FILED. No service date.[3002239] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:44 AM] |
Filing 21 ORDER, dated 12/11/2020, dismissing appeal by 01/04/2021, unless Appellant Nigel Fredericks, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2992018] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/11/2020 11:21 AM] |
Filing 20 ATTORNEY, James Edward Johnson, for Correction Officer John Doe, Deputy Officer John Doe, Captain Officer John Doe, Captain John Smith, Captain or Deputy John Doe, Correction Officer John Doe, TERMINATED.[2992002] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/11/2020 11:16 AM] |
Filing 19 LETTER, on behalf of Appellees John Richardson, John Shaheen, John Smith, and all John Does, informing the Court that the Law Department will not enter an appearance on appellees behalf, RECEIVED. Service date 12/10/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2991128] [20-3918]--[Edited 12/11/2020 by VB] [Entered: 12/10/2020 12:37 PM] |
Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [15], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2990208] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/09/2020 02:58 PM] |
Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Prison Litigation Reform Act Authorization Form, [14], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2990205] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/09/2020 02:52 PM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [13], on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2990176] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/09/2020 02:34 PM] |
Filing 15 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, FILED. Service date 12/01/2020 by US mail.[2990168] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/09/2020 02:29 PM] |
Filing 14 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 12/01/2020 by US mail.[2990165] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/09/2020 02:27 PM] |
Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, FILED. Service date 12/01/2020 by US mail.[2990162] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/09/2020 02:25 PM] |
Filing 11 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2985217] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/02/2020 05:12 PM] |
Filing 10 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/02/2020, denying IFP, RECEIVED.[2985213] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/02/2020 05:11 PM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Julie Steiner, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney James Edward Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[2985183] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/02/2020 04:49 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee John Richardson and John Shaheen, FILED. Service date 12/01/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2983774] [20-3918] [Entered: 12/01/2020 11:07 AM] |
Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[2979926] [20-3918] [Entered: 11/23/2020 11:44 AM] |
Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[2979094] [20-3918] [Entered: 11/20/2020 01:54 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE, re: pending district court IFP motion, to district court, copy to pro se appellant, SENT.[2979083] [20-3918] [Entered: 11/20/2020 01:49 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2979077] [20-3918] [Entered: 11/20/2020 01:46 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/20/2020, RECEIVED.[2979075] [20-3918] [Entered: 11/20/2020 01:45 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredericks, FILED. [2979073] [20-3918] [Entered: 11/20/2020 01:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.