Ryle, Jr. v. Rehrig Pacific Company
Defendant / Appellee: Michael Bush and Rehrig Pacific Company
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Ryle, Jr.
Case Number: 20-3948
Filed: November 23, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER, [ # 10 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Joseph Ryle, Jr. failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE.[3010203] [20-3948] [Entered: 01/11/2021 09:39 AM]
January 11, 2021 Filing 14 NEW CASE MANAGER, Atasha Joseph, ASSIGNED.[3010184] [20-3948] [Entered: 01/11/2021 09:32 AM]
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, dated 12/14/2020, dismissing appeal by 01/04/2021, unless Appellant Joseph Ryle, Jr., submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2992984] [20-3948] [Entered: 12/14/2020 12:03 PM]
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, dated 12/14/2020, dismissing appeal by 01/04/2021, unless Appellant Joseph Ryle, Jr., submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2992982] [20-3948] [Entered: 12/14/2020 12:00 PM]
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER, dated 12/14/2020, dismissing appeal by 01/04/2021, unless Appellant Joseph Ryle, Jr., submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2992975] [20-3948] [Entered: 12/14/2020 11:57 AM]
December 10, 2020 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Michael Bush and Rehrig Pacific Company, FILED. Service date 12/10/2020 by US mail.[2991522] [20-3948] [Entered: 12/10/2020 04:39 PM]
November 25, 2020 Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, dated 11/23/2020, denying IFP, RECEIVED.[2981569] [20-3948] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:47 AM]
November 25, 2020 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2981568] [20-3948] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:42 AM]
November 23, 2020 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2981567] [20-3948] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:40 AM]
November 23, 2020 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/22/2020, RECEIVED.[2981566] [20-3948] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:39 AM]
November 23, 2020 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 10/22/2020, RECEIVED.[2981565] [20-3948] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:39 AM]
November 23, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Ryle, Jr., FILED. [2981564] [20-3948] [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ryle, Jr. v. Rehrig Pacific Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Michael Bush
Represented By: Kristi Rich Winters Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Rehrig Pacific Company
Represented By: Kristi Rich Winters Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Joseph Ryle, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph Ryle Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?