Ruiz Flores v. Garland
| SAUL REYES MERCED and REYNA RUIZ FLORES |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-4121 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 MOTION ORDER, denying as moot, for stay of removal, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, FILED. [Entered: 09/09/2021 11:12:00 AM] |
| Filing 36 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 09/08/2021, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 09/08/2021 05:12:00 PM] |
| Filing 35 FRAP 42(b) IMMIGRATION REMAND ORDER, remanding case to BIA, pursuant to this Court's October 16, 2012 opinion, by RJS, FILED. [Entered: 09/08/2021 05:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 34 NEW CASE MANAGER, Khadijah Young, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 09/08/2021 05:09:00 PM] |
| Filing 33 MOTION, for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, on behalf of Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, FILED. [Entered: 09/01/2021 01:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 32 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Respondent Merrick B. Garland Brief due date 10/27/2021, FILED. [Entered: 08/19/2021 10:05:00 AM] |
| Filing 31 CURED DEFECTIVE LR 31.2 scheduling notification, at entry 30, on behalf of filer Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/12/2021 04:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 30 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, informing Court of proposed due date 10/27/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/09/2021 03:37:00 PM] |
| Filing 29 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 scheduling notification, at docket entry [28], on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/09/2021 01:48:00 PM] |
| Filing 28 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, informing Court of proposed due date 10/27/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/28/2021 05:10:00 PM] |
| Filing 27 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, FILED. [Entered: 07/28/2021 04:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 26 LETTER on behalf of Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, informing that court that they will proceed on the original agency record filed in the this case, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:52:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 BRIEF, on behalf of Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, FILED. [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:43:00 PM] |
| Filing 24 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced and Reyna Ruiz Reyes Brief due date as 07/30/2021, FILED. [Entered: 05/11/2021 02:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, informing Court of proposed due date 07/30/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/06/2021 03:58:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 05/05/2021 10:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 21 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED. [Entered: 05/05/2021 09:55:00 AM] |
| Filing 20 Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, replaced by Merrick B. Garland, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 3/15/2021 05:30:41 PM] |
| Filing 19 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 02/01/2021 01:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED. [Entered: 01/27/2021 01:46:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 01/25/2021 03:20:00 PM] |
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Connie Mazariego, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/20/2021 12:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED. [Entered: 12/29/2020 03:11:18 PM] |
| Filing 14 William P. Barr, Respondent, replaced by Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 05:40:45 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Anthony C. Payne for Respondent William P. Barr, ADDED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:39:20 PM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Joseph D. Hardy in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:38:14 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:24:59 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:17:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 Motion, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, FILED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 11:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, FILED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 11:00:02 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, FILED. [Entered: 12/14/2020 10:51:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:30:55 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioners Reyna Ruiz Flores and Saul Reyes Merced, USCA receipt # A02-208-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:27:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 OIL, for Respondent William P. Barr, ADDED. [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:24:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioners Reyna Ruiz Flores and Saul Reyes Merced, received on 12/10/2020, OPENED. [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:22:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 11/20/2020 12:00:00 AM, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/10/2020 01:31:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Reyna Ruiz Flores, Petitioner Saul Reyes Merced, FILED. [Entered: 12/10/2020 01:31:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
