Pelaez Tapia v. Rosen
Petitioner: RODOLFO PORFIRIO PELAEZ TAPIA
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 20-4173
Filed: December 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2021 Filing 14 BRIEF & SPECIAL APPENDIX, on behalf of Petitioner Rodolfo Porfirio Pelaez Tapia, FILED. [Entered: 08/27/2021 06:43:00 PM]
January 5, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 12/30/2020, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 01/05/2021 04:13:20 PM]
January 5, 2021 Filing 12 APPEAL, pursuant to Clerk order, dated 12/30/2020, WITHDRAWN. [Entered: 01/05/2021 04:09:09 PM]
January 5, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION ORDER, dated 12/30/2020 granting motion to withdraw appeal, filed by Petitioner Rodolfo Porfirio Palaez Tapia, FILED. [Entered: 01/05/2021 04:00:40 PM]
December 30, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/30/2020 02:57:27 PM]
December 30, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/30/2020 02:15:55 PM]
December 29, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Rodolfo Porfirio Pelaez Tapia, FILED. [Entered: 12/29/2020 02:38:31 PM]
December 29, 2020 Filing 7 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2) AMENDED. [Entered: 12/29/2020 02:19:07 PM]
December 28, 2020 Filing 6 William P. Barr, Respondent, replaced by Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 05:41:00 PM]
December 18, 2020 Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 12/18/2020 03:01:19 PM]
December 18, 2020 Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Rodolfo Porfirio Pelaez Tapia, USCA receipt # 02-209-ACMS FILED. [Entered: 12/18/2020 02:55:18 PM]
December 18, 2020 Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Rodolfo Porfirio Pelaez Tapia, received 12/11/2020, OPENED. [Entered: 12/18/2020 02:54:09 PM]
December 18, 2020 Filing 2 OIL for Respondent William P. Barr, ADDED. [Entered: 12/18/2020 02:50:45 PM]
December 11, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Rodolfo Porfirio Pelaez Tapia, FILED. [Entered: 12/18/2020 01:38:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pelaez Tapia v. Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RODOLFO PORFIRIO PELAEZ TAPIA
Represented By: Bruno Joseph Bembi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?