Yang v. Mic Network Inc.
Stephen Yang |
Mic Network Inc. |
20-4201 |
December 21, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant-Cross-Appellee Stephen Yang in 20-4097 Brief due date as 03/17/2021. Joint Appendix due date as 03/17/2021, FILED.[3010812] [20-4097, 20-4201] [Entered: 01/11/2021 03:41 PM] |
Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: Form C & D [ # 10 ], on behalf of Appellee-Cross-Appellant Mic Network Inc. in 20-4097, FILED.[3010325] [20-4097, 20-4201] [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:49 AM] |
Filing 21 NEW CASE MANAGER, Brenda Mojica, ASSIGNED.[3010319] [20-4201] [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:46 AM] |
Filing 18 NOTICE, to Appellee Stephen Yang, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3009966] [20-4201] [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:02 PM] |
Filing 16 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Mic Network Inc., FILED. Service date 01/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3009651] [20-4201] [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:31 PM] |
Filing 15 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Mic Network Inc., FILED. Service date 01/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3009649] [20-4201] [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:30 PM] |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Mic Network Inc., FILED. Service date 01/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3009643] [20-4201] [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:27 PM] |
Filing 11 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant-Cross-Appellee Stephen Yang in 20-4097, Appellee Stephen Yang in 20-4201, informing Court of proposed due date 03/17/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 01/07/2021 by CM/ECF.[3008384] [20-4097, 20-4201] [Entered: 01/07/2021 01:25 PM] |
Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM C & D, [ # 3005043-2 ], [ # 3005037-2 ], on behalf of Appellee-Cross-Appellant Mic Network Inc. in 20-4097, FILED.[3008320] [20-4097, 20-4201] [Entered: 01/07/2021 12:55 PM] |
Filing 9 NEW CASE MANAGER, Brenda Mojica, ASSIGNED.[3000732] [20-4097, 20-4201] [Entered: 12/28/2020 08:33 AM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2998729] [20-4201] [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:40 AM] |
Filing 4 NOTE: See lead case, 20-4097, containing complete set of docket entries.[2998728] [20-4201] [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:40 AM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Mic Network Inc., district court receipt # ANYSDC-23126833, FILED.[2998726] [20-4201] [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:39 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 11/09/2020, RECEIVED.[2998724] [20-4201] [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:38 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Mic Network Inc. in 20-4201, FILED. [2998716] [20-4201, 20-4097] [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Yang v. Mic Network Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: Stephen Yang | |
Represented By: | James H. Freeman Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Mic Network Inc. | |
Represented By: | Eleanor M. Lackman Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.